Which Ad Was the Winner?
Posted by Dr Sarah Farrant
There are a lot of people in the advertising industry who hate this.

It’s the same as students who hate tests or athletes who don’t want to look at the scoreboard.
Some people don’t like the accountability of measured results. Many advertising types prefer to talk about vague terms such as “creativity” or “visual impact.” Bring up the subject of results and they often look like scared rabbits. Frankly, I love measured results. It can be tough on the ego at times. But it eliminates a lot of guesswork and helps assure that campaigns are effective. After all, marketing should be a bottom-line activity.
Recently, we conducted some tests using local Facebook ads and I’d like to share the results.
The technique we used is called “split testing.”
Split testing is a powerful strategy for increasing the effectiveness of advertising. Two versions of an ad are created. One half of your target group see one version of an ad, the other half sees the alternate version. By tracking the number of responses you can determine which ad is more effective. You then use the one that generates the best results in your future advertising. Split testing can help compare different selling appeals, prices, and just about any aspect of your product or service.
By using Google or Facebook ads, you can get results quickly and with a minimum amount of money being invested. In this case, the client was a dental practice looking to attract new patients. The service being offered was a teeth-whitening program.
TEST NUMBER ONE
For the first test, identical headlines and body copy were used. What was being tested was the image. In one, we focused on a close up of woman with an attractive smile. The second image was a close up of just a beautiful smile. Which do you think did a better job of attracting people who wanted to whiten their teeth? Here are the two options that were tested:

Result: The ad with the full face pulled 400% better than the ad with just the close-up of the smile.
TEST NUMBER TWO
The next test compared two different headlines. The first used the “A Whiter Smile For Summer” headline. The second used “Whiten Your Smile for $99.” Again, the only difference between the two ads was the headline. Which do you think got better results?

Results: The headline “Whiten Your Smile for $99″ pulled 53% better than the headline, “A Whiter Smile For Summer.” It appears that bringing the specific price up into the headline added a “deal” factor to the ad that made it more compelling. This then became our new winner and the ad to beat. (This is called “the control” in direct response advertising terms.)
TEST NUMBER THREE
For the next test, we compared an image of a pleasant older couple against our control. All other factors were kept the same. Would both a man and woman with great smiles generate more responses than a single woman?

Results: Again, the image with the smiling woman produced better results, yielding a 58% better response rate. At this point we decided we should give the smiling woman a name. We decided on “Melissa.” It was much easier than constantly saying “the pleasant, smiling, blonde woman.”
TEST NUMBER FOUR
Next, Melissa had to defend her top spot against an attractive younger woman. Again, the only difference was the image. All other factors were kept the same.

Results: The new woman did quite well, out pulling all of our other tested ads. However, she was unable to do better than Melissa. Melissa out pulled the challenger by 47%. So, as our “control” Melissa continues to run.
TESTING – THE KEY TO RESULTS
One thing that becomes crystal clear through testing is that different selling messages and images get different results. If you are not tracking your results and testing new appeals, you are not getting the best yield from your marketing.
By using tools such as Google Adwords or Facebook, it is possible to get tangible results in days. They are very fast tools for measuring the effectiveness of different ads. By building on what works best, you can enhance the results your marketing generates (like what Richard did here). The best way to know what works is to test and measure your results. If you haven’t done so already, make testing a key part of your marketing strategy.
There are a lot of people in the advertising industry who hate this.

It’s the same as students who hate tests or athletes who don’t want to look at the scoreboard.
Some people don’t like the accountability of measured results. Many advertising types prefer to talk about vague terms such as “creativity” or “visual impact.” Bring up the subject of results and they often look like scared rabbits. Frankly, I love measured results. It can be tough on the ego at times. But it eliminates a lot of guesswork and helps assure that campaigns are effective. After all, marketing should be a bottom-line activity.
Recently, we conducted some tests using local Facebook ads and I’d like to share the results.
The technique we used is called “split testing.”
Split testing is a powerful strategy for increasing the effectiveness of advertising. Two versions of an ad are created. One half of your target group see one version of an ad, the other half sees the alternate version. By tracking the number of responses you can determine which ad is more effective. You then use the one that generates the best results in your future advertising. Split testing can help compare different selling appeals, prices, and just about any aspect of your product or service.
By using Google or Facebook ads, you can get results quickly and with a minimum amount of money being invested. In this case, the client was a dental practice looking to attract new patients. The service being offered was a teeth-whitening program.
TEST NUMBER ONE
For the first test, identical headlines and body copy were used. What was being tested was the image. In one, we focused on a close up of woman with an attractive smile. The second image was a close up of just a beautiful smile. Which do you think did a better job of attracting people who wanted to whiten their teeth? Here are the two options that were tested:

Result: The ad with the full face pulled 400% better than the ad with just the close-up of the smile.
TEST NUMBER TWO
The next test compared two different headlines. The first used the “A Whiter Smile For Summer” headline. The second used “Whiten Your Smile for $99.” Again, the only difference between the two ads was the headline. Which do you think got better results?

Results: The headline “Whiten Your Smile for $99″ pulled 53% better than the headline, “A Whiter Smile For Summer.” It appears that bringing the specific price up into the headline added a “deal” factor to the ad that made it more compelling. This then became our new winner and the ad to beat. (This is called “the control” in direct response advertising terms.)
TEST NUMBER THREE
For the next test, we compared an image of a pleasant older couple against our control. All other factors were kept the same. Would both a man and woman with great smiles generate more responses than a single woman?

Results: Again, the image with the smiling woman produced better results, yielding a 58% better response rate. At this point we decided we should give the smiling woman a name. We decided on “Melissa.” It was much easier than constantly saying “the pleasant, smiling, blonde woman.”
TEST NUMBER FOUR
Next, Melissa had to defend her top spot against an attractive younger woman. Again, the only difference was the image. All other factors were kept the same.

Results: The new woman did quite well, out pulling all of our other tested ads. However, she was unable to do better than Melissa. Melissa out pulled the challenger by 47%. So, as our “control” Melissa continues to run.
TESTING – THE KEY TO RESULTS
One thing that becomes crystal clear through testing is that different selling messages and images get different results. If you are not tracking your results and testing new appeals, you are not getting the best yield from your marketing.
By using tools such as Google Adwords or Facebook, it is possible to get tangible results in days. They are very fast tools for measuring the effectiveness of different ads. By building on what works best, you can enhance the results your marketing generates (like what Richard did here). The best way to know what works is to test and measure your results. If you haven’t done so already, make testing a key part of your marketing strategy.





It has been many years since I read his book but over the past few months I have been doing some piecing together, research if you would like to call it that, well as “researchie” as a philosopher can get, of my own in relation to business being a reflection of our life.


I came across this piece of writing a while ago now, actually it was whilst I was going through Palmer and I recently found it again. It was written by a lady called Hunter Lovins who founded the Rocky Mountain Insitute in Colorado, USA. It is a story essentially about patch ups. It is my wish for you to share it with your practice members too.
If we take a closer look at the nerve system – the body’s communicating system – we notice a series of intricate and well-designed wires leading in many different directions. To the untrained eye it would seem chaotic, but the body knows what to do every time, one hundred percent of the time, provided there is no interference. There are thousands upon thousands of nerves, all of which come together at the base of the skull to form the spinal cord. There are thirty-three pairs of nerves coming from the cord itself and each branches with other nerves in order to innervate all the cells, tissues, organs and systems of the body. This then creates one hundred percent coordinated function, which further enables the expression of health to take place. If we look closely at the cellular level we see twelve different nerve fibers innervating it. Remember, this is only at the cellular level. Furthermore, there is an average of 100,000 synaptic endings for every nerve fiber. There are, therefore, over 1.2 million nerve endings that are constantly hooking up in various intricate ways to innervate one cell. The body truly is ingenious in design and the more I learn about it the more I am humbled by the intelligence that runs it.
Factories were ablaze with smoking chimney stacks and people were certainly optimistic about their futures. In Davenport, Iowa, a little town on the Mississippi, boats were delivering cargo and picking up material to take elsewhere. In this bustling town a discovery was about to emerge, a discovery that would change the direction of health care in the immediate present and foreseeable future. A discovery so great that people’s lives would change as a result. Some would embrace and integrate this new understanding whilst others would be challenged and threatened and as a result try and stop the spread of this vital truth.


There really are many ways to live your life but there are few that will contest that there are many ways to run your business. In fact there are true and tested ways that, if soundly followed, will enable you to establish a profitable business and contribute handsomely to the life of your dreams. But you have to be prepared to look inside – yourself and your business. And, there are many ways to do this. Just look at the number of books on the business shelves at Borders, Barnes and Noble and other such stores. But, there are business principles that I will share with you here that don’t cost the earth, in fact cost nothing, and by merely implementing them and following through with them will enable you to build a profitable business.

After a series of adjustments, Ben’s cranium started to balance itself. His neck movements started to become larger and overall the boy came alive. Sue and Mark took Ben back to the pediatrician. While Sue was sitting in the waiting room, she couldn’t help but notice another mother sitting there with her child who was already in a helmet. Sue found she couldn’t stop herself from sharing the information with the mother about her experience of regular adjustments and the impact it had made to Ben’s life and their own life in such a short time. Sue sat there sharing everything with this lady until the pediatrician came out to call the next patient. The pediatrician couldn’t help but also notice the changes in Ben’s cranium. He was astonished at the results in such a short period of time. 





